I happened to glance at the screen while my 5 year old daughter was playing virtual dress-up.
Hello “Goldberg Jones – Divorce for Men”. Nice to meet you. Actually, nice to get reacquainted with you.
My daughter is getting these ads because I was on Goldberg Jones’ site last week researching some duplicate content issues. And now the web thinks I’m thinking of going single. And so does my daughter . . . and when she logs onto our shared computer, so does my wife.
Due to all of the legal searches I do . . . the search engines and advertisers think I’m a drunk driving tax evader with mesothelioma whose wife is about to leave me before I’m deported.
And these ads are going to follow my wife around the web for the next 30 to 90 days. Let’s say she spends her free time looking at pictures of cute fuzzy seals . . .
Or oggling David Beckham in his one-size-too-small undies . . .
You get the point.
Now of course in theory, users can change their privacy settings to (mostly) avoid retargeted advertising; however, we all know that in reality many users fail to do so.
Retargeting is a very effective advertising tool. It sells Nikes, trips to France, car insurance and even SEO Agency services. I’ve helped many of my clients implement retargeting – but, given the nature of legal work – retargeting should be considered very carefully. Retargeting is a marketing channel that some practice areas should just steer clear of.